Given that the core of the disagreement is over Israeli settlement expansion in the Occupied Territory of East Jerusalem you might expect a news organization to offer a little bit of historical and legal context - you know, like some small reference to the 20+ Security Council Resolutions on Jerusalem that Israel has violated. Or given the chest thumping sectarian triumphalism of Netanyahu -
"The Jewish people were building Jerusalem 3,000 years ago and the Jewish people are building Jerusalem today. Jerusalem is not a settlement. It's our capital." [Morning Edition, 3-23-10]- you could hope for a gentle history lesson that would not leave such a steaming pile of racist propaganda sitting out there unchallenged. And given that ALL the Israeli settlements are illegal under international law, you might expect to hear the word "illegal" or the phrase "Security Council" in any one of the pieces on the East Jerusalem settlements aired on NPR in the past week. So how does NPR do? Let's have a look:
At the time of this posting,
- A search of "israel settlements" as "Heard on Air" in the past 7 days results in 9 reports, 8 of which are on NPR's main news programs, and 1 of which was on Talk of the Nation.
- Add the term "illegal" to the same search and...nothing!
- Replace "illegal" with "security council" and...again nothing.
"...Jerusalem is sovereign Israeli territory, and it has the same status as Tel Aviv. And just as Israelis have a right to build anywhere in Tel Aviv, they have a right to build anywhere in the city of Jerusalem...."Seriously, one doesn't have to be a radical to state the obvious about Israel and its settlement policies. Regarding Jerusalem, UN Amb. George H. W. Bush (seriously) stated way back in 1971,
"We regret Israel's failure to acknowledge its obligations under the Fourth Geneva Convention as well as its actions which are contrary to the letter and the spirit of this convention,"and - as President - he and his administration continued to make almost identical points nearly twenty years later. I guess that was so pre-9/11 - you know, back when such quaint ideas as the Geneva Convention still held sway in some quarters of the Village.
4 comments:
That Netanyahu comment (and others) at AIPAC has just carpeted the air waves. The World report
http://www.theworld.org/2010/03/23/israel-and-the-jerusalem-issue/
said Bibi just talks loud, but carries a small stick. No sweat, relax, he's just a tad hyperbolic in his rhetoric.
Justin Raimundo's column suggests the Israelis should settle for less. He concludes his column,
As it stands now, the US is subsidizing and supporting the expansion of the Jewish state at the expense of the Palestinians, while Israel is doing its best to drag us into a war with Iran, and ignite the whole region. The ensuing chaos would give cover to complete the goal of the extremist Likud-far right alliance: the establishment of a "Greater Israel."
This is a mission the United States should have nothing to do with, and the Obama administration knows it. Their response to Israeli intransigence is a good first step, but in order to make it stick they must go beyond mere rhetoric. The Israeli government can’t build settlements if we stop paying for them: they can’t threaten their neighbors, oppress an entire people, and maintain a working alliance with the West unless it’s with our active cooperation. Cut off their funding – and see how quickly they’ll turn, because they know their survival is at stake.
And to think that Isreal was described as a "moral democracy" on a recent TotN.
edk
Here is blog Mondonweiss's excellent take on the same issue with NPR.
http://mondoweiss.net/2010/03/when-it-comes-to-e-jerusalem-npr-misleads-and-misinforms.html#more-16919
Thanks to both of you for trying to set these liars straight.
Post a Comment